Correction to: The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0365-6.].

The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

BACKGROUND: Job loss, austerity measures, financial difficulties and house repossession contribute to the risk of self-harm and suicide during recessions. Navigating the benefits system and accessing sources of welfare and debt advice is a difficult experience for vulnerable people, further contributing to their distress. Whilst there is some evidence that advice-type interventions can lead to financial gain, there is mixed evidence for their effectiveness in improving mental health in those experiencing financial difficulties. There have been no interventions targeting those who have self-harmed due to economic hardship. METHODS: Our aim was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychosocial intervention (the 'HOPE' service) for people presenting to hospital emergency departments (ED) following self-harm or in acute distress because of financial, employment or welfare (benefit) difficulties. Nineteen people consented to random allocation to the intervention or control arm on a 2:1 basis. Participants randomised to the intervention arm (n = 13) received up to six sessions of 1:1 support provided by community support staff trained in Motivational Interviewing (MI). Control participants (n = 6) received a one-off session signposting them to relevant support organisations. Fourteen participants were followed up after 3 months. Participants and mental health workers took part in qualitative interviews. The acceptability of outcome measures including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, repeat self-harm, EQ5D-5 L and questions about debt, employment and welfare benefits were explored. RESULTS: Interviews indicated the main benefits of the service as the resolution of specific financial problems and receiving support when participants were feeling most vulnerable. Randomisation was acceptable to most participants although not always fully understood and control participants could be disappointed. Recruitment was slow (1-2 per month). The outcome measures were acceptable and appeared sensitive to change. DISCUSSION: The HOPE intervention is feasible and acceptable. There was evidence of need and it is a relatively inexpensive intervention. Refining aspects of the intervention would be straightforward. A full-scale RCT would be feasible, if broadened eligibility criteria led to increased recruitment and improvements were made to staff training and support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN58531248.

HOPE: Help fOr People with money, employment, benefit or housing problems: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-harm and suicide increase in times of economic recession. Factors including job loss, austerity measures, financial difficulties and house repossession contribute to the risk. Vulnerable individuals commonly experience difficulties in navigating the benefits system and in accessing the available sources of welfare and debt advice, and this contributes to their distress. Our aim is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychosocial intervention (the "HOPE" service) for people presenting to hospital emergency departments (ED) following self-harm or in acute distress because of financial, employment, or welfare (benefit) difficulties. METHOD: A pilot study including randomisation will be employed to determine whether it is possible to undertake a full-scale trial. Twenty people presenting to the ED who have self-harmed, have suicidal thoughts and depression and/or are in crisis and where financial, employment or benefit problems are cited as contributory factors will be asked to consent to random allocation to the intervention or control arm on a 2:1 basis. People who require secondary mental health follow-up will be excluded. Those randomised to the intervention arm will receive up to six sessions with a mental health worker who will provide practical help with financial and other problems. The mental health worker will use the motivational interviewing method in their interactions with participants. Control participants will receive one session signposting them to existing relevant support organisations. Participants will be followed up after 3 months. Participants and the mental health workers will take part in qualitative interviews to enable refinement of the intervention. The acceptability of outcome measures including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, repeat self-harm, EQ5D-5L and questions about debt, employment and welfare benefits will be explored. DISCUSSION: This study will assess whether a full-scale randomised trial of this novel intervention to prevent self-harm among those distressed because of financial difficulties is feasible, including the acceptability of randomisation, potential rate of recruitment and the acceptability of outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN58531248.

Seeking help in times of economic hardship: access, experiences of services and unmet need.

BACKGROUND: Economic recessions are often accompanied by increased levels of psychological distress and suicidal behaviour in affected populations. Little is known about the experiences of people seeking help for employment, financial and benefit-related difficulties during recessions. We investigated the experiences of people struggling financially in the aftermath of the Great Recession (2008-9) - including some who had self-harmed - and of the frontline support staff providing assistance. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with three groups of people in two cities: i) people who had self-harmed due to employment, financial or benefit concerns (n = 19) ('self-harm'); ii) people who were struggling financially drawn from the community (n = 22), including one focus group) ('community'); iii) and frontline staff from voluntary and statutory sector organisations (e.g., Job Centres, Debt Advice and counselling agencies) providing support services to the groups (n = 25, including 2 focus groups) ('service providers'). Data were analysed using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Service provision was described by people as confusing and difficult to access. The community sample reported considerably more knowledge and access to debt advice than the participants who had self-harmed - although both groups sought similar types of help. The self-harm group exhibited greater expectation that they should be self-reliant and also reported lower levels of informal networks and support from friends and relatives. They had also experienced more difficult circumstances such as benefit sanctions, and most had pre-existing mental health problems. Both self-harm and community groups indicated that practical help for debt and benefit issues would be the most useful - a view supported by service providers - and would have particularly helped those who self-harmed. CONCLUSION: Interventions to identify those in need and aid them to access practical, reliable and free advice from support agencies could help mitigate the impact on mental health of benefit, debt and employment difficulties for vulnerable sections of society.

Understanding vulnerability to self-harm in times of economic hardship and austerity: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Self-harm and suicide increase in times of economic recession, but little is known about why people self-harm when in financial difficulty, and in what circumstances self-harm occurs. This study aimed to understand events and experiences leading to the episode of self-harm and to identify opportunities for prevention or mitigation of distress. SETTING: Participants' homes or university rooms. PARTICIPANTS: 19 people who had attended hospital following self-harm in two UK cities and who specifically cited job loss, economic hardship or the impact of austerity measures as a causal or contributory factor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Semistructured, in-depth interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed cross-sectionally and as case studies. RESULTS: Study participants described experiences of severe economic hardship; being unable to find employment or losing jobs, debt, housing problems and benefit sanctions. In many cases problems accumulated and felt unresolvable. For others an event, such as a call from a debt collector or benefit change triggered the self-harm. Participants also reported other current or past difficulties, including abuse, neglect, bullying, domestic violence, mental health problems, relationship difficulties, bereavements and low self-esteem. These contributed to their sense of despair and worthlessness and increased their vulnerability to self-harm. Participants struggled to gain the practical help they felt they needed for their economic difficulties or therapeutic support that might have helped with their other co-existing or historically damaging experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Economic hardships resulting from the recession and austerity measures accumulated or acted as a 'final straw' to trigger self-harm, often in the context of co-existing or historically damaging life-experiences. Interventions to mitigate these effects should include providing practical advice about economic issues before difficulties become insurmountable and providing appropriate psychosocial support for vulnerable individuals.

Self-cutting and risk of subsequent suicide.

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that people who self-cut have a higher risk of suicide than those who self-poison. Self-cutting ranges from superficial wrist cutting to severe self-injury involving areas such as the chest, abdomen and neck which can be life threatening. This study aimed to investigate whether the site of self-cutting was associated with risk of subsequent suicide. METHODS: We followed-up 3928 people who presented to hospital following self-harm between September 2010 and December 2013 in a prospective cohort study based on the Bristol Self-harm Surveillance Register. Demographic information from these presentations was linked with coroner's data to identify subsequent suicides. RESULTS: People who presented with self-cutting to areas other than the arm/wrist were at increased risk of suicide compared to those who self-poisoned (HR 4.31, 95% CI 1.27-14.63, p=0.029) and this increased risk remained after controlling for age, sex, history of previous self-harm and psychiatric diagnosis (HR 4.46, 95% CI 1.50-13.25, p<0.001). We observed no such increased risk in people presenting with cutting to the arm/wrist. LIMITATIONS: These data represent the experience of one city in the UK and may not be generalisable outside of this context. Furthermore, as suicide is a rare outcome the precision of our estimates is limited. CONCLUSIONS: Site of self-injury may be an important indicator of subsequent suicide risk.

Epidemiology, management and outcome of paracetamol poisoning in an inner city emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol poisoning accounts for just under half of all self-poisoning cases that present to hospitals in England. Treatment with acetylcysteine is routine, yet recommendations regarding its use vary internationally and have recently been revised in England and Wales. METHODS: Data on all cases of paracetamol poisoning presenting to an adult inner city emergency department between May 2011 and April 2012 were prospectively collected using the Bristol Self-harm Surveillance Register. RESULTS: Paracetamol overdoses accounted for 44% of adult self-poisoning cases. A quarter (26.9%) of patients required treatment with acetylcysteine and it was estimated that recent changes in treatment guidelines would increase that proportion to 32.6%. Paracetamol concentration was positively associated with the risk of any adverse reaction to acetylcysteine. 22.5% of patients experienced anaphylactoid reactions to acetylcysteine. There was no clear evidence of an association between risk of anaphylactoid reaction and blood paracetamol levels. Patients presenting with blood paracetamol levels greater than 200 mg/L at 4 h post-ingestion were at greater risk of repeat self-harm (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.21, p=0.033). DISCUSSION: The recent changes in UK treatment guidelines are expected to increase the proportion of our population requiring acetylcysteine by 5.7%. We found no clear evidence that risk of anaphylactoid or more general adverse reaction to acetylcysteine was increased in patients presenting with lower blood paracetamol concentrations. Blood paracetamol level was highlighted as a potentially useful clinical indicator for risk of repeat self-harm.

Effect of interferon-α on cortical glutamate in patients with hepatitis C: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

BACKGROUND: The development of depressive symptomatology is a recognized complication of treatment with the cytokine interferon-α (IFN-α) and has been seen as supporting inflammatory theories of the pathophysiology of major depression. Major depression has been associated with changes in glutamatergic activity and recent formulations of IFN-induced depression have implicated neurotoxic influences that could also lead to changes in glutamate function. The present study used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to measure glutamate and its major metabolite glutamine in patients with hepatitis C who received treatment with pegylated IFN-α and ribavirin. METHOD: MRS measurements of glutamate and glutamine were taken from a 25 × 20 × 20 mm voxel including the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex in 12 patients before and after 4-6 weeks of treatment with IFN. RESULTS: IFN treatment led to an increase in cortical levels of glutamine (p = 0.02) and a significant elevation in the ratio of glutamine to glutamate (p < 0.01). Furthermore, changes in glutamine level correlated significantly with ratings of depression and anxiety at the time of the second scan. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that treatment with IFN-α is associated with MRS-visible changes in glutamatergic metabolism. However, the changes seen differ from those reported in major depression, which suggests that the pathophysiology of IFN-induced depression may be distinct from that of major depression more generally.

Dopaminergic challenges in social anxiety disorder: evidence for dopamine D3 desensitisation following successful treatment with serotonergic antidepressants.

Serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIs) are first-line treatments for social anxiety disorder [SAnD], though there is evidence of dopaminergic system dysfunction. Twenty subjects with DSM-IV SAnD, untreated (n = 10) and SSRI-remitted DSM-IV SAnD (n = 10), were administered a single dose of 1) a dopamine agonist (pramipexole 0.5 mg) and 2) a dopamine antagonist (sulpiride 400 mg), followed by anxiogenic challenges (verbal tasks and autobiographical scripts) in a double-blind crossover design, the two test days being one week apart. Anxiety symptoms were measured by self-reported changes in Visual Analogue Scales, specific SAnD scales and anxiety questionnaires. Plasma levels of prolactin were obtained. Untreated SAnD subjects experienced significant increases in anxiety symptoms following behavioural challenges after either sulpiride or pramipexole. Following remission with SSRIs, the socially anxiogenic effect of behavioural provocation was significantly attenuated under pramipexole, whereas under sulpiride effects remained significantly elevated. There appears to be instability of the dopamine system under behavioural stress in social anxiety subjects that is only partly rectified by successful treatment with an SSRI, which may induce a desensitisation of postsynaptic dopamine D(3) receptors.

Using sleep to evaluate comparative serotonergic effects of paroxetine and citalopram.

BACKGROUND: SSRIs suppress rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, probably by increasing serotonin in the brainstem, and also increase sleep fragmentation. Although in the UK, paroxetine (PAR) and citalopram (CIT) have recommended doses of 20 mg/day for the treatment of depression, the recommended dose of CIT in USA is higher (40 mg). If similar doses of PAR and CIT have similar effects on central serotonin then they should have similar effects on sleep measures in volunteers. METHOD: This was a randomised, double blind placebo controlled crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects took PAR 20 mg mane, CIT 20 mg mane or placebo mane for 3 days and sleep was recorded overnight at home on the third night. Standard measures of sleep were derived. RESULTS: REM sleep was significantly suppressed and sleep fragmentation increased by both drugs. Measures of REM sleep and sleep continuity previously found to be altered by SSRIs were considered together and compared with placebo as a 'serotonin response'; this was significantly greater in the PAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep effects typical of SSRIs were greater with PAR 20 mg/day than CIT 20 mg/day, suggesting greater effects on 5HT uptake blockade.

Evaluation of actigraphy and automated telephoned questionnaires to assess hypnotic effects in insomnia.

This study aimed to explore new methodologies in insomnia research, namely whether actigraphy was suitable to show hypnotic effects over weeks in insomnia, and to compare an automated method of questionnaire data collection with traditional methods. Thirty-eight insomniacs took part in a 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of 2 weeks of administration of temazepam 20 mg on sleep. Outcome measures were actigraphy and daily St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaires (SMHSQ). Actigraphy was performed using Actiwatch (CNT) and analysed using both the automated Actiwatch sleep analysis software and non-parametric analysis of rest-activity rhythms. The questionnaires were administered as straightforward pencil-and-paper for half of the time and an automated telephoned system for the other half. The experimental paradigm allowed within-subject comparison of traditional and automated data collection, both on and off drug. Actigraphy showed a high degree of inter-subject variability but, nevertheless, some sleep variables (Fragmentation Index, Actual Sleep Time %) showed significant improvement during drug treatment, and Sleep Efficiency and Actual Sleep Time were significantly worsened during the first post-drug week. Nonparametric circadian rhythm analysis showed no significant effect. Subjective data from the SMHSQ showed significant drug effects and there was no significant difference in scores between the automated and pencil-and-paper methods; automated data collection was slightly more acceptable to patients and minimized data entry and management. Effect sizes using within-subject and between-subject comparisons were calculated for the subjective and objective measures to inform future studies

Chest pain: panic attack or heart attack?

Chest pain is a common presentation to both primary and secondary care physicians but is often non-cardiac in origin. Patients presenting with chest pain may be experiencing a panic attack. Panic disorder is a disabling psychiatric condition with serious consequences, such as impaired social functioning and increased risk of suicide. Comorbidity of panic disorder with other psychiatric conditions is common and often leads to increased severity of anxiety symptoms and a poorer prognosis. The cost of misdiagnosing non-cardiac chest pain is high. It is important for physicians to be able to recognise panic attacks and to distinguish them from cardiac disease, thus avoiding unnecessary use of healthcare resources. This review discusses the prevalence and diagnosis of panic attack and panic disorder in patients presenting with chest pain to primary care physicians and cardiologists. Treatment options for panic disorder are considered, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which are emerging as the first-line choice for the treatment of panic disorder.

Flumazenil challenge in social phobia.

The benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, can provoke panic attacks in some panic disorder patients. It has been predicted that panic responses to flumazenil may be associated with situational fear. Patients with social phobia frequently experience situational anxiety and panic attacks. The current study tested whether flumazenil induces panic in patients with social phobia. Fourteen patients with social phobia (DSM-III-R) and 14 age- and sex-matched controls were tested in a single session, double blind crossover challenge design, using intravenous flumazenil 2 mg/20 ml or matched placebo infusions 1 hour apart. Panic attacks occurred during flumazenil challenge in 2/14 subjects with social phobia. The rate of panic attacks and the severity of panic symptoms following flumazenil were not significantly greater in patients than in controls. Situational fears that are provoked by social cues therefore do not predict panic responses to flumazenil.

Assessment of GABA(A)benzodiazepine receptor (GBzR) sensitivity in patients on benzodiazepines.

OBJECTIVES: To measure GABA(A) benzodiazepine receptor sensitivity in patients taking benzodiazepines and compare with matched controls. METHODS: Seven patients who were on prescribed benzodiazepines for an anxiety disorder or insomnia were recruited from general practice and an adult mental health service outpatient clinic. They were matched with seven volunteers. All subjects received an intravenous injection of midazolam 50 microgram/kg in 10 ml normal saline over 10 min. Objective responses to midazolam were assessed using saccadic eye movement velocity slowing and subjective assessments using visual analogue scales. Measurements were recorded for 120 min and plasma midazolam concentrations obtained at 15-min intervals post-infusion to 120 min. Ratios of pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic effects were obtained for each individual to estimate GABA(A) benzodiazepine receptor sensitivity. RESULTS: Patients had an attenuated response to midazolam on both subjective and objective measures. GABA(A) benzodiazepine receptor sensitivity was significantly reduced in the patient group. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic treatment with benzodiazepines was associated with reduced effects of midazolam. Saccadic eye movement velocity was especially sensitive as a measure of attenuated response.

Flumazenil in alcohol withdrawal: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

The purpose of the present study was to study gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor function in alcohol-dependent subjects during withdrawal, using the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. In particular, we wanted to examine the hypotheses that an endogenous inverse agonist ligand at the GABA-A benzodiazepine receptor (GBzR) is active during withdrawal (in which case flumazenil should be anxiolytic), or whether chronic alcohol intake results in a shift in sensitivity of the receptor in the inverse agonist direction (in which case flumazenil should be anxiogenic). Results from 15 alcohol-dependent subjects in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study showed that flumazenil was neither anxiolytic nor anxiogenic, although withdrawal scores were reduced during the course of the study. The fact that flumazenil was not anxiogenic, as it is in panic disorder, suggests that the GBzR is functioning differently in these two clinically similar conditions.

Do SSRIs prolong seizure duration during ECT?

The effect of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on seizure duration during a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was evaluated in a retrospective study. Although numbers in the SSRI group were small (n=13), there was a significantly longer seizure duration with SSRIs, compared with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). More studies are needed to see whether this is a general finding or whether it reflects individual variation, and most importantly, what effects, if any, this has on clinical outcome.